O filosofo crÃtico é um gênio
Palavras-chave:
Kant, genius, art, philosophy, interpretationResumo
This article intends to show first that the systematic demands placed in the Preface to Criticism of the faculty of judging impose a restriction on the concept of genius to artistic activity; second, it provides an interpretation of the complementarity of the receptive moment and the creative moment in the case of the work of art. In the concluding part, it brings together some characteristics of genius to the critical philosopher on the basis of some significant analogies: the legislative activity of genius and that of reason, the analogy with the function of making a technical activity compatible with an organic vision and the necessary complementarity between receptive and creative / communicative moments in art and philosophy.Referências
ACOSTA E., Die Wissenschaftslehre als Kunstwerk. Bloß ein Gleichnis? Versuch einer ästhetischen Betrachtung der Wissenschaftslehre. Fichte-Studien Volume 41, 2014 Pages 23-43.
BECKENKAMP J., Kant e Gerard sobre imaginação. Studia Kantiana 20 (2016), 117-127.
BENCIVENGA E., La rivoluzione copernicana di Kant. Trad. it. A Jori. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 2000.
CECCHINATO G., “Fichtes Ästhetik. Eigene Reflexionen über Kunst und Wissenschaftslehreâ€. Fichte-Studien 32, (2009), pp. 161-168.
FERRARIN A., The Powers of Pure Reason. Kant and the Idea of Cosmic Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 2015.
FIGUEIREDO V., “Produz o gênio suas obras (de arte) como a macieira, suas maçãs?†In: Caminhos da Razão: Estudos em homenagem a Guido Antônio de Almeida e Raul Ferreira Landim Filho. Nau Editora 2019.
FIGUEIREDO V., “Sobre abismos, pontes e travessiasâ€. Con-Textos Kantianos. 12 (2020), 143-172.
FIGUEIREDO V., O gênio kantiano ou o refém da Natureza. in: Horizontes do Belo – Ensaios sobre a estética de Kant. Editora UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 2017.
KAUARK-LEITE P., On the role of imagination in a Kantian account of scientific creativity. Paper for the Workshop: Metaphern, Symbole und Analogien in Kants kritischen Schriften Organisation: Manja Kisner und Larissa Wallner, München, 2020
KAUARK-LEITE, P. (2020), “Ouse criar! Por um Iluminismo poiético†en L. Castelo Branco, L. Krucken e S. Silva (orgs.), Inutilezas para um mundo bárbaro, Brasil (no prelo).
KISNER, M. Originalität im Denken und das Denken der Originalität bei Kant. In: M. KISNER, G. BASILE, A. LYSSY, M.B. WEISS, (Hrsg.). Das Selbst und die Welt. Beiträge zu Kant und der nachkantischen Philosophie. Festschrift für Günter Zöller, p. 74-95. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann Verlag, 2019.
LA ROCCA C., Il conflito delle interpretazioni, Kant, Meier, Eberhard e l’ermeneutica filosofica. In: Soggetto e Mondo. Studi su Kant. Marsilio, Venezia, 2003, pp. 155-182.
OSTARIĆ, L. (2010), “Works of genius as sensible exhibitions of the idea of the highest goodâ€. Kant-Studien 101 (1), pp. 22-39
SGARBI M., La logica dell’irrazionale. Studio sul significato e i problemi della Kritik der Urteilskraft, Mimesis, Milano-Udine, 2015.
SILVA F. M. F. “O conceito de gênio nas lições de antropologia de Kant†In. Kriterion, Belo Horizonte, 135, (2016), 677-702.
SUZUKI M., O Gênio Romântico, Illuminuras, São Paulo, 1998.
TONELLI G., Kant’s Early Theory of Genius (1770-1779) In “Journal of the History of Philosophy†4 (1966), part I pp. 109-132, part II pp. 209-224.
VIDMAR JOVANOVIĆ I., A New Look at Kant’s Genius: a Proposal of a Multi-componential Account. Con-Textos Kantianos. N.o12, December2020, pp.248-269.
WEISS M.B., Ästhetik des Lebens Fichtes Adaption der Transzendentalen Kunstphilosophie im Projekt der Wissenschaftslehre. Fichte-Studien 25 (2014), 229-246.
ZÖLLER G., Mecchanism or Organism: Kant on the Symbolic Representation of the Body Politic. In P. KAUARK-LEITE, G. CECCHINATO, V. FIGUEIREDO, M. RUFFING, A. SERRA (eds.), Kant and the Metaphors of Reason. OLMS Verlag, Hildesheim, 2015, pp. 303-319.
