Systematic perspectives on the distinction between appearances and things in themselves in the Critique of Pure Reason

Autores

  • Joel T. Klein Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Palavras-chave:

Things in themselves, appearances, illusion, theoretical and practical interests

Resumo

In this paper I argue that in the first Critique and in the Prolegomena Kant’s distinction between Appearances and Things in themselves do not belong to a single, one-dimensional system, but actually entails six different layers. Each layer has a particular perspective on the concept of things in themselves, which is used for drawing specific boundaries regarding appearances and is related to a particular kind of illusion. I also argue that these six different meanings of things in themselves are systematically articulated according the broader use of reason in its theoretical and practical field.

Referências

ALLISON, H. E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: Revised and Enlarged Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press (1st edn 1983), 2004.

AQUILLA, R. E. Representational Mind: A Study of Kant’s Theory of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983.

DE BOER, K. Kant's Reform of Metaphysics: The Critique of Pure Reason Reconsidered. CUP, 2020.

DE BOER, K. Kant’s Multi-Layered Conception of Things in Themselves, Transcendental Objects, and Monads. Kant-Studien, 105(2), 221-260, 2014.

GUYER, P. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

KANT, I. The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant. CUP. (1998ff)

KLEIN, J. T. “Die Weltgeschichte im Kontext der Kritik der Urteilskraftâ€. Kant-Studien, v. 104, p. 188-212, 2013.

KLEIN, J. T. “Kant’s constitution of a moral image of the worldâ€. Kriterion, v. 60, p. 103-125, 2019.

KLEIN, J. T. “Sobre o significado e a legitimidade transcendental dos conceitos de precisão, interesse, esperança e crença na filosofia kantianaâ€. Veritas (Porto Alegre), v. 59, p. 143-173, 2014.

KLEIN, J. T. “The practical-regulative teleology and the idea of a universal history in the Critique of pure reasonâ€. In: Leonel Ribeiro dos Santos; LOUDEN, R. B.; MARQUES, U. R. A. (Org.). Kant e o a Priori. 1ed.São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2017, v. 1, p. 291-302.

OBERST, M. “Two worlds and two aspects: on Kant’s distinction between things in themselves and appearancesâ€. Kantian Review, 20, 1, 53–75, 2015.

PRAUSS, G. Erscheinung: ein Problem der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971.

PRAUSS, G. Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich. Bonn: Bouvier, 1974.

ROBINSON, H. “Two Perspectives on Kant’s Appearances and Things in Themselvesâ€. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 32, 411–41, 1994.

STEVENSON, L. “Kant’s many concepts of appearancesâ€. In. Cogito v.12, n.3, 181-186, 1998.

VAN CLEVE, J. Problems from Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

WOOD, A. W. Kant. Malden: Blackwell, 2005.

ZÖLLER, G. Theoretische Gegenstandsbeziehung bei Kant. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1984.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-12-15

Edição

Seção

Artigos