‘Transformação total’: Por que Kant não desistiu da educação
Palavras-chave:
Kant, educação, autonomia, destino, disposições.Resumo
Nesse ensaio argumento que Kant permanece comprometido com a necessidade e a importância fundamental da educação ao longo da sua carreira. Segundo Johann Bernhard Basedow (1724-1790) Kant afirma que a ‘transformação total’ das escolas é necessária, e ele mantém essa perspectiva não apenas na década de 1770, mas, também, em seus últimos anos. Na construção do meu ensaio, eu tento refutar duas recentes interpretações opostas – a saber, a de Reinhard Brandt com um posicionamento kantiano de um precoce ‘entusiasmo educacional’ que mais tarde foi substituÃdo pelo entusiasmo polÃtico e a visão de Manfred Kuehn, segundo a qual a crescente importância da autonomia na ética madura de Kant leva-o a diminuir a ênfase na educação.Referências
ARISTOTLE. Ethica Nicomachea, ed. I. Bywater, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
BASEDOW, J. B. Ausgewählte pädagogische Schriften, ed. Albert Reble, Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1965.
BECK, L. W. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
BECK, L. W. Essays on Kant and Hume, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1878.
BERGK, J. A. ‘Ueber die Einschrankung der Freiheit zu Studieren durch die Staat’. Monatschrift für Deutsche; Zur Veredlung der Kenntnise, zur Bildung des Geschmacks, und zu froher Unterhaltung, 1801, 1: 3-16.
BOWEN, J. A History of Western Education, vol. 3, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981.
BRANDT, R. Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant. Hamburg: Meiner, 2007.
BÜSCHING, A. F. Wöchentliche Nachrichten von neuen Landcharten, geographischen, statistischen und historischen Büchern und Schriften. Berlin: Haude and Spener, 1776.
FICHTE, J. G. Reden an die deutsche Nation. Leipzig: Philipp Reclam, n.d.
HERBART, J. F. Review of Immanuel Kant über Pädagogik, ed. Friedrich Theodor Rink. Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen, 27, 1804, pp. 257-61.
HERMAN, B. ‘Training to Autonomy: Kant and the Question of Moral Education’. In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Philosophers on Education: New Historical Perspectives, New York: Routledge, 1998, pp. 255-72.
HILL, Jr., T. E. ‘Kantian Autonomy and Contemporary Ideas of Autonomy’. In SENSEN, O. (ed.), Kant on Moral Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 15-31.
JOHNSTON, J. S. Kant’s Philosophy: A Study for Educators. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.
KANT, I. Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1900-.
KANT, I. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, General Editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 -.
KANT, I. Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, Werner Stark (ed.). Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004.
KUEHN, M. ‘Introduction’. In Kant, Immanuel, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, ed. and trans. Robert B. Louden (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2006, pp. vii-xxix.
KUEHN, M. ‘Kant on Education, Anthropology, and Ethics’. In. ROTH, K.; SUPRENANT, C. W. (eds.), Kant on Education: Interpretations and Commentary, New York: Routledge, 2012, pp. 55-68.
LANG, O. H. Basedow: His Educational Work and Principles. New York: Kellogg, 1891.
LEIBNIZ, G. W. ‘Preface to the New Essays’. In G. W. Leibniz, Philosophical Essays, ed. ARIEW, R.; GARBER D. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989, pp. 291-306.
LOUDEN, R. B. Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
LOUDEN, R. B. The World We Want: How and Why the Ideals of the Enlightenment Still Elude Us, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
LOUDEN, R. B. ‘Making the Law Visible: The Role of Examples in Kant’s Ethics’. In TIMMERMANN, J. (ed.), Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2009, pp. 63-81.
LOUDEN, R. B. ‘“Not a Slow Reform, but a Swift Revolutionâ€: Kant and Basedow on the Need to Transform Education’. In. ROTH, K.; SUPRENANT, C. W. (eds.), Kant on Education: Interpretations and Commentary (New York: Routledge), 2012a, pp. 39-54.
LOUDEN, R. B. ‘Translator’s Introduction’ [to the Menschenkunde transcription]. In Immanuel Kant, Lectures on Anthropology, ed. Allen W. Wood and Robert B. Louden, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012b, pp. 283-87.
LOUDEN, R. B. ‘Cosmopolitical Unity: The Final Destiny of the Human Species’. In Alix Cohen (ed.), Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 211-29.
MORAN, K. A. ‘Can Kant Have an Account of Moral Education?’ Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 43, 2009, 471-84.
MORAN, K. A. Community and Progress in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2012.
MUNZEL, G. F. Kant’s Conception of Moral Character: The ‘Critical’ Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
MUNZEL, G. F. Kant’s Conception of Pedagogy: Toward Education for Freedom. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2012.
PARRY, G. ‘Education Can Do All’. In GERAS, N.; WOKLER, R. (eds.), The Enlightenment and Modernity, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000, pp. 25-49.
PARRY, G. ‘Education’. In HAAKONSSEN, K. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
PAULSEN, F. German Education, Past and Present, trans. T. Lorenz, London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1908).
QUICK, R. H. Essays on Educational Reformers. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1896.
RAUMER, K. von. Geschichte der Pädagogik. Stuttgart: Liesching, 1843.
REISERT, J. R. ‘Kant and Rousseau on Moral Education’. In ROTH, K.; SUPRENANT, C. W. (eds.), Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary (New York: Routledge), 2012, pp. 12-25.
RUTSCHKY, K.. (ed.) Schwarze Pädagogik, Frankfurt and Berlin: Ullstein, 1997.
SUPRENANT, C. W. ‘Kant’s Contribution to Moral Education’. In ROTH, K.; SUPRENANT, C. W. (eds.), Kant on Education: Interpretations and Commentary (New York: Routledge), 2012, pp. 1-11.
WARE, O. Review of Klas Roth and Chris W. Suprenant (eds.), Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2012.
