Los esquemas de los conceptos empÃricos y matemáticos como procedimientos de sÃntesis gobernados por reglas conceptuales
Palavras-chave:
Kant, esquematismo, empÃricos, matemáticos, procedimientosResumo
El objetivo del presente artÃculo es ofrecer una interpretación de la doctrina del esquematismo de los conceptos empÃricos y matemáticos presentada por Kant en su CrÃtica de la razón pura. Mostramos que los esquemas de los conceptos empÃricos y matemáticos son procedimientos de sÃntesis gobernados por reglas conceptuales. Aunque no consideramos que esta doctrina kantiana carece de problemas, nuestro trabajo muestra que: 1) esos esquemas pueden distinguirse rigurosamente de sus correspondientes conceptos; 2) esos esquemas no son entidades superfluas. Estas conclusiones se alcanzan mostrando que el contenido de un concepto (esto es, un conjunto de notas discursivas) determina la unidad de elementos sensibles que tiene que ser efectuada por un esquema en tanto procedimiento de sÃntesis.Referências
ALLISON, Henry E. “Kant’s critique of Berkeleyâ€, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11.1 (1973): 43-63.
ALLISON, Henry E. Kant’s transcendental idealism. Revised and enlarged edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
AQUILA, Richard E. “Kant’s theory of conceptsâ€, Kant-Studien 65.1 (1974): 1-19.
ARIAS, MartÃn (2008) “¿Hay un esquematismo de los conceptos empÃricos y matemáticos? (Kant: Critica de la Razón Pura, A 138/ B 177)â€, Anuario Filosófico, 41.3 (2008): 621-635.
ARIAS ALBISU, MartÃn. “Una relación de homogeneidad entre términos heterogéneos. El concepto de homogeneidad en el capÃtulo del esquematismo de la Critica de la razón puraâ€, Diánoia, 54.63 (2009a): 71-88.
ARIAS ALBISU, MartÃn. “Heterogeneidad y diferencia. Acerca de los problemas del esquematismo trascendental y del esquematismo de los conceptos empÃricos y matemáticosâ€, Cuadernos Filosóficos. Segunda Época, 6 (2009b): 49-60.
ARIAS ALBISU, MartÃn. “On two different lines of argumentation in Kant’s theory of schematism of empirical and mathematical conceptsâ€, Kant Studies Online, (2014): 1-42. <http://www.kantstudiesonline.net/KSO_Author_AK_files/AriasAlbisuMartin01713.pdf>
BAXTER, Donald L. M. “Abstraction, Inseparability and Identityâ€, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57.2 (1997): 307-330.
BAYNE, Steven M. Kant on causation. On the fivefold routes to the principle of causation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2004.
BAYNE, Steven M. “Abstract general ideas and Kant’s schematismâ€. En: Valerio Rodhen y otros (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Vol. 2, p. 97-105, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.
BAYNE, Steven M. “Marks, images, and rules: concepts and transcendental idealismâ€. En: Dennis Schulting y Jacco Verburgt (eds.), Kant’s idealism. New interpretations of a controversial doctrine. p. 127-142. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
BENNETT, Jonathan. Kant’s analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
BERKELEY, George. The works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne (A.A. Luce y T. E. Jessop, eds.). London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1948-1957.
CAIMI, Mario. Leçons sur Kant. La déduction transcendantale dans la deuxième édition de la Critique de la raison pure. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 2007.
CAIMI, Mario. “Comments on the conception of imagination in the Critique of Pure Reasonâ€. En: Valerio Rodhen y otros (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Vol. 1, p. 39-50. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.
CHIPMAN, Lauchlan. “Kant’s categories and their schematismâ€, Kant-Studien, 63.1 (1972): 36-50.
DAHLSTROM, Daniel O. “Thinking, knowing, and schematismâ€. En: Gerhard Funke (ed.), Akten des 5. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Mainz 4.-8. April 1981. Vol. I.1, p. 209-220. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1981.
DESCARTES, René. Meditationes de prima philosophia. En: Charles Adam y Paul Tannery (eds.), Œuvres de Descartes. Vol. 7, Paris: Léopold Cerf, 16411, 1642/ 1904.
DÃœSING, Klaus. “Schema und Einbildungskraft in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunftâ€. En: Lothar Kreimendahl (ed.), Aufklärung und Skepsis. Studien zur Philosophie und Geistesgeschichte des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts. p. 47-71. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1995.
ECO, Umberto. Kant y el ornitorrinco. Trad. por Helena Lozano Miralles. Barcelona: Lumen, 1997/ 1999.
ERDMANN, Benno. “Kant und Hume um 1762â€, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 1.1 (1888): 62-77, 1.2 (1888): 216-230.
FELDMAN, Susan. “Kant’s schemata as reference rulesâ€. En: Gerhard Funke y Thomas M. Seebohm (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress. Vol. II.1, p. 229-240. Washington, DC: The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America, 1989.
FERRARIN, Alfredo. “Construction and mathematical schematism. Kant on the exhibition of a concept in intuitionâ€, Kant-Studien, 86.2 (1995a): 131-174.
FERRARIN, Alfredo. “Kant’s productive imagination and its alleged antecedentsâ€, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 18.1 (1995b): 65-92.
GINSBORG, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a law: Kant on the free play of imagination and understandingâ€, Philosophical Topics, 25.1 (1997): 37-81.
GINSBORG, Hannah. “Thinking the particular as contained under the universalâ€. En: Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and cognition in Kant’s critical philosophy. p. 35-60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
GUYER, Paul. Kant and the claims of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1929/ 1991.
HUME, David. An enquiry concerning human understanding. And other writings (Stephen Buckle, ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17481, 1777/ 2007.
KANT, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften (Akademie-Ausgabe). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1900 ss.
KANT, Immanuel. CrÃtica de la razón pura. Trad. por Mario Caimi. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1787/ 2009.
KANT, Immanuel. Lógica. Un manual de lecciones (Edición original de G. B. Jäsche). Trad. por MarÃa J. Vázquez Lobeiras. Madrid: Akal, 2000.
KEMP SMITH, Norman. A commentary to Kant’s “Critique of pure reasonâ€. London: Macmillan, 1918.
KIM, Joongol. “Concepts and intuitions in Kant’s philosophy of geometryâ€, Kant-Studien, 97.2 (2006): 138-162.
KLEMME, Heiner F. (ed.). Reception of the Scottish Enlightenment in Germany: Six significant translations, 1755–1782. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2000.
KORIAKO, Darius. “Kants Schematismuslehre und ihre Relevanz für die Philosophie der Mathematikâ€, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 83.3 (2001): 286-307.
KÖRNER, Stephan. Kant. London: Penguin Books, 1955.
LA ROCCA, Claudio. “Schematismus und Anwendungâ€, Kant-Studien, 80.2 (1989): 129-154.
LA ROCCA, Claudio. “How are synthetic apriori judgments possible? The conditions and process of empirical knowledge in Kantâ€, Quaestio, 4 (2004): 265-293.
LEAVITT, Frank J. “Kant’s schematism and his philosophy of geometryâ€, Stud. in Hist. and Phil. of Science, 22.4 (1991): 647-659.
LOCKE, John. An essay concerning human understanding (Peter H. Nidditch, ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press, 16891, 1700/ 1975.
LONGUENESSE, Béatrice. Kant and the capacity to judge. Trad. por Charles T. Wolfe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993/ 1998.
MELLIN, G. S. A. Encyclopädisches Wörterbuch der kritischen Philosophie. Züllichau/Jena y Leipzig: Friedrich Frommann, 1797-1804.
METZ, Wilhelm. Kategoriendeduktion und produktive Einbildungskraft in der theoretischen Philosophie Kants und Fichtes. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1991.
MOTTA, Giuseppe. “‘Das Phantom des berkleyischen Idealisms’. Su alcuni riferimenti a J. G.H. Feder nella Critica della ragion puraâ€, Studi Kantiani, 25 (2012): 59-69.
NOLAN, J. P. “Kant on meaning: two studiesâ€, Kant-Studien, 70.2 (1979): 113-130.
PARSONS, Charles. “Arithmetic and the categoriesâ€, Topoi, 3.2 (1984): 109-121.
PATON, Herbert J. Kant’s metaphysic of experience. A commentary on the first half of the Kritik der reinen Vernunft. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1936/ 1970.
PHILONENKO, Alexis. “Lecture du schématisme transcendantal.†En: Joachim Kopper y Wolfgang Marx (eds.), 200 Jahre Kritik der reinen Vernunft. p. 291-312. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg, 1981.
PIPER, William B. “Kant’s contact with British empiricismâ€, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 12.2 (1978-1979): 174-189.
PIPPIN, Robert B. “The schematism and empirical conceptsâ€, Kant-Studien, 67.2 (1976): 156-171.
PIPPIN, Robert B. “Kant on empirical conceptsâ€, Stud. in Hist. and Phil. of Science, 10.1 (1979): 1-19.
PIPPIN, Robert B. Kant’s theory of form. An essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. New Haven: Yale University, 1982.
PITCHER, Georg. Berkeley. Trad. por José A. Robles GarcÃa. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1977/ 1983.
SCHRADER, George. “Kant’s theory of conceptsâ€, Kant-Studien, 49.1-4 (1958): 264-278.
SEEL, Gerhard. “Die Einleitung in die Analytik der Grundsätze, der Schematismus und die obersten Grundsätzeâ€. En: Georg Mohr y Marcus Willaschek (eds.), Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft. p. 217-246. Berlin: Akademie, 1998.
SHABEL, Lisa. “Kant on the ‘symbolic construction’ of mathematical conceptsâ€, Stud. in Hist. and Phil. of Science, 29.4 (1998): 589-621.
SHABEL, Lisa. “Kant’s philosophy of mathematics.†En: Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Kant and modern philosophy. p. 94-128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
SMIT, Houston. “Kant on marks and the immediacy of intuitionâ€, The Philosophical Review, 109.2 (2000): 235-266.
STADELMANN, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich selbst: Berkeley und Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.
STERN, Leah J. “Empirical concepts as rules in the Critique of Pure Reasonâ€. En: Gerhard Funke (ed.), Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Mainz 6.-10. April 1974. Vol. II.1, p. 158-165. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1974.
SUTHERLAND, Daniel. “Kant on arithmetic, algebra, and the theory of proportionsâ€, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44.4 (2006): 533-558.
TURBAYNE, Colin M. (1955) “Kant’s refutation of dogmatic idealismâ€, The Philosophical Quarterly, 5.20 (1955): 225-244.
WARDA, Arthur. Immanuel Kants Bücher. Berlin: Martin Breslauer, 1922.
WARNOCK, Geoffrey J. “Concepts and schematismâ€, Analysis, 9.5 (1949): 77-82.
WOLFF, Christian. Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. En: Jean École y otros (eds.), Gesammelte Werke. Vol. I.2. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 17201, 1751/ 1983.
WOLFF, Robert P. “Kant’s debt to Hume via Beattieâ€, Journal of the History of Ideas, 21.1 (1960): 117-123.
WOLFF, Robert P. Kant’s theory of mental activity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963.
YOUNG, Michael. “Kant on the construction of arithmetical conceptsâ€, Kant-Studien, 73.1 (1982): 17-46.
YOUNG, Michael. “Construction, schematism, and imaginationâ€, Topoi, 3.2 (1984): 123-131.
YOUNG, Michael. “Kant’s view of imaginationâ€, Kant-Studien, 79.2 (1988): 140-164.
